Posts Tagged ‘Random House’

but not at Amazon. Oh no. This time they are striking back at those subversive institutions called libraries. You remember them? Libraries were those buildings your mother warned you against going into. They had — gasp — books in them. Books are bad. They make you think. They let you imagine what like might be like on another planet or in another country. So now Random House is working to make sure you can’t bring those awful institutions into your home via your e-book reader.

Yes, the above is written with my tongue very firmly planted in my cheek. Well, not all of it. Random House has struck against libraries and, frankly, it stinks and is just another reason why I have to wonder about all those authors and others who are so quick to jump to publishers’ defense against Amazon.

In the continuing saga of Random House and OverDrive, the publisher has announced its new pricing for ebooks to libraries. In short, prices for Random House titles have been increased as much as 300%.

From The Digital Shift, e-book prices for RH titles through OverDrive will be:

  • Titles available in print as new hardcovers: $65- $85
  • Titles available for several months, or generally timed to paperback release: $25-$50
  • New children’s titles available in print as hardcovers: $35-$85
  • Older children’s titles and children’s paperbacks: $25-$45

Now, that’s a bit deceptive when you look at this example, also from The Digital Shift. Eisenhower in War and Peace went from $40 before the new pricing scheme went into effect to $120. Blessings by Quindlen went from $15 to $45. That’s not exactly what the RH price list shows, is it?

In all fairness, I will admit that RH is the only one of the big six (to my knowledge) that hasn’t imposed restrictions like an e-book can only be loaned 20 times before the library has to “buy” a new copy. But this is just as bad, in my opinion, especially in this day and age when libraries are fighting for their very existence due to decreased city and county budgets.

Now, the supposed reason RH raised the prices for their e-books this much was to align them with the price of RH audiobooks available for download. On the surface, that almost makes sense. However, if you scratch that surface just a little, you’d know how wrong that is. It doesn’t cost nearly as much to make an e-book as it does and audiobook. So there is no huge financial expense RH is trying to offset.

No, it all comes down to the fact that RH, like so many legacy publishers, hate e-books. They failed to embrace the new technology early on and now they are running scared. Why? Because more and more people are moving to e-books from paper books. The ease of carrying around your entire library with you wherever you go, space, environmental concerns, and economic concerns are all reasons why people are changing. But it is more fundamental that that. We are a technological society. Our kids are raised using computers more than pen and paper. Those kids are now young adults. They buy what they are comfortable with and that, friends, is digital.

So libraries, in an attempt to remain relevant to the next generation, as well as to their aging patrons who can’t get out of the house as much as they could and who have been given e-readers by their families, have to make the transition to digital as well. But the big six publishers, and the smaller publishers trying to act like their larger counterparts, are making it next to impossible for them to do so.

PublishersLunch sums it up very well: Random House announced their library ebook pricing, effective as of March 1, which will dampen some of the enthusiasm for the house’s commitment to the “unrestricted and perpetual availability of our complete frontlist and backlist of Random House, Inc.” in ebook form.

Don’t be fooled by the language in RH’s statement that they are open to input from libraries. The data they are supposedly asking for was there before the new pricing scheme was put into place. But RH either didn’t ask for it or chose to ignore it. What they are proposing is to let the libraries suffer for who knows how long before they have sufficient data to change the prices. And that assumes they ever have sufficient data to change things. Of course, I could be wrong.

Now, let’s see how long it takes for authors to take up the cry against these publishers for screwing libraries. Wait, what is that? Is that the sound of crickets? Of course it is. Those same authors who rail against Amazon as being evil won’t stir themselves to fight for survival of our libraries or for these same libraries to have these authors’ titles available for download. Instead, they’ll beat their chests and pump their fists all in support of the publishers that really aren’t looking after their best interests.

Read Full Post »

Back in January, I posed this question over on The Naked Truth. I thought it might be time to look at the question again, especially in light of Random House’s decision to go with the agency model, the inquiries into whether or not the agency model is legal — not only here but in Great Britain — and Australia’s decision that it is NOT legal (Way to, OZ!). So, with your indulgence, here’s the post from January, with a few additional comments or edits.

What is a Book?

According to Jeffrey Matthews (vp for corporate strategy for Scholastic), “That’s the $64 million question.”

It is also a question the publishing industry — publishers and authors alike — can’t seem to agree upon. Ten years ago, it was easy to answer that question. A book was, well, a book. It was something you could walk into a bookstore or your public library and hold, take home and read. You bought a book you liked and read it, sometimes many times. You loaned it to your friends and family — often with threats of violence if they didn’t return it. You could sell it to used bookstores for a bit of pocket cash (of course, if you did and then someone else bought the book, the author didn’t get any more money from it).

Now it’s not quite so simple to answer that question. A number of publishers feel a book is still a book — that physical incarnation of an author’s words into print. Print being the operative word. E-books have thrown a wrench into the works and the industry simply hasn’t figured out how to respond. This includes publishers, agents and writers.

That’s one of the reasons we find so many publishers applying DRM to their e-books. Not understanding that doing so is like telling a recalcitrant child “no”, publishers say they have to apply DRM to their e-books to protect them from piracy. They don’t stop to think that that merely waves a red flag saying, “I bet you can’t find a way to break our code.” Guess what, that’s a challenge and what happens when you issue a challenge? It’s usually taken up. Don’t believe me, simply google “how to break DRM” and see how many hits you get and how many verified codes using Python and other programs there are.

DRM does something else. It adds to the cost of e-books. And, honestly, there will always be people out there who will post digital versions of books online for free. Their reasons vary. Some do it because, in their countries, the books may not be available in digital — and sometimes even in print — formats. Some do it because, as noted above, it’s a challenge and they hate being told they can’t do something. But digital piracy isn’t limited to books released in digital formats. If I remember correctly, the last Harry Potter book — none of which have been legitimately released as e-books — was online as a PDF e-book before the book hit the shelves. So, how did applying DRM to a digital file help prevent piracy?

But there is another reason people break DRM on e-books. A book that is “protected” by DRM is tied to a certain type of device. For example, if you by a DRM’d e-book through Amazon, it is tied to the kindle or kindle apps. It’s the same with B&N and the nook, etc. But worse, there is a limit on how many compatible devices the e-book can be downloaded to. Say you have a family of three. Every one of them have a kindle and they have the kindle app for their laptops or smart phones, etc. That’s at least 6 potential forms of tech that e-book can be read on. But, wait. There’s a hitch. The publisher has limited the number of devices to 4. So Junior can’t read that book on his smart phone because it is already registered to the maximum number of devices. That’s like telling me I can only read a physical book in four of six rooms in my house. Sorry, but I bought it, I should be able to read it when and where I want — and on whatever device I have with me at the time.

And this brings me to the question posed in the title of this post. What is a book?

This is a question those of us involved with Naked Reader Press asked ourselves long before we opened our digital doors. We’d seen interviews with publishers who hold that a book is only the physical incarnation of an author’s work. Under this definition, those of us who buy e-books aren’t buying the book. Instead, we are only buying a license to read the author’s work in a certain digital format. DRM is their way of enforcing this by preventing us from doing with digital books what we can with physical ones — loan them, sell them, donate them. Even so, these same publishers who are so adamant about limiting our access to these e-books — and if you don’t believe me, buy an e-book using Adobe Digital Editions and try to read it on a machine that isn’t tied to that specific Adobe account — are more than willing to charge us as much or more for the digital version than we’d pay for the paperback copy of the book.

Still, not all publishers feel this way. There are some like Baen Books who believe that, once you buy an e-book, it’s yours. They don’t apply DRM and don’t limit the number of e-readers or computers you can view the e-book on. To them, and to me, a book is made up of the words an author writes. A book can take many forms — physical paper versions, electronic, audio, enhanced, etc. A book is something meant to be enjoyed by readers in whatever form they are most comfortable with.

This divide in thinking may be narrowing. The Nook, and now the Kindle, allow lending of e-books (with publisher approval). Mind you, it’s limited to only being able to lend a book one time, for a period of two weeks. During that two week period, the original purchaser of the e-book cannot access it. There is the option being offered through these sellers for authors and small publishers to bring out their books DRM-free. Guess what, most of them choose no DRM. Why? Because they are selling BOOKS, not licenses.

But publishers are still trying to throw kinks in the works when it comes to e-books. Not too long ago, Harper Collins announced it was going to limit the number of times an e-book can be checked out by a library. According to HC, the magic number is 26. After that time, the title will no longer be available unless the library buys it again. Of course, HC says that it will be at a discounted price, but I’m not holding my breath. Besides, I have a several problems with HC’s reasoning here. First, they say they came up with this magic number because this is the average number of checkouts a physical book goes through before it is pulled from the shelves. This ignores the fact that, if this is true, the library simply cleans and repairs the book and then puts it back into circulation. It’s not removed unless it is lost or destroyed or beyond repair. My next issue is that I can just imagine how ticked I’d be if I happened to be number 27 on the wait list for that e-book, only to be told I couldn’t check it out. Finally, publishers don’t put a limit on the number of times a physical book can be checked out. All they are doing by limited e-books in this manner is once more saying they don’t look at e-books as real books. (For more on this, check out this post and this one.)

So, what is a book? To me, a book is the collection of words, written by an author for readers to read in whatever format they like: hard cover, trade paperback, mass market paperback, digital or enhanced. After all, why should it make a difference if the book is printed on paper or on your computer screen or smart phone? A book is a book is a book and it’s time the industry’s definition caught up with technology.

So, what is a book to you?


(Cross-posted from Mad Genius Club)

Read Full Post »